What Is Artificial Lift?

Back to Blog

Why Wells Need Artificial Lift

A well flows naturally as long as reservoir pressure can overcome the weight of the fluid column and the friction in the tubing. As a reservoir depletes, or as water cut rises and the column gets heavier, that natural drive weakens and production falls off or stops. Artificial lift restores or increases the rate by supplying the missing energy - either by physically pumping the fluid or by lightening the fluid column.

The great majority of the world's oil wells are on some form of artificial lift. In unconventional plays, wells often go on lift very early in life because they decline steeply, and the lift method may change several times as rates and conditions evolve.

The Main Methods

Rod pumping (sucker rod / beam pumping) uses a surface pumping unit to reciprocate a downhole plunger pump - the classic pumpjack, dominant in lower-rate onshore wells. Electric submersible pumps (ESPs) are multistage centrifugal pumps run downhole on a power cable, suited to high volumes. Gas lift injects compressed gas into the tubing to lighten the fluid column, and works well with high gas-to-liquid wells and deviated wellbores.

Progressing cavity pumps (PCPs) use a rotor-and-stator screw pump, favored for viscous or sandy fluids. Plunger lift uses the well's own gas energy and a free-traveling plunger to sweep liquids off the bottom, common in gas wells that load up with liquid. Each has a distinct sweet spot in rate, depth, fluid, and cost.

Selecting and Monitoring Lift

Method selection weighs production rate, depth, deviation, gas and water content, solids, temperature, power availability, and capital versus operating cost. A high-volume offshore well leans ESP; a stripper well onshore leans rod pump; a gassy well may suit gas lift or plunger lift. Optimizing lift over the well's life is a continuous engineering task.

Every lift method depends on data: pump intake pressure and motor load for ESPs, dynamometer cards for rod pumps, injection rate for gas lift, cycle counts for plunger lift. SCADA collects these signals from field controllers, and a cloud platform such as Merobix can read them over Modbus so lift performance is tracked and alarmed across the whole field.

Lift Changes Over the Life of a Well

Lift selection is not a one-time decision. A typical unconventional well might flow naturally for a short period, go on gas lift or an ESP while rates are high, and convert to rod pump or plunger operation as production declines - each transition triggered by the economics of the moment, not by a calendar. Conversions cost workover money, so operators try to time them deliberately: run the current method as deep into its efficient range as possible, but not so long that inefficiency and failures eat the savings.

That means the selection factors deserve periodic re-checking against actual well performance. Rate, water cut, gas fraction, and sand all drift over the years, and the method that was right at completion can be quietly wrong later in life. The evidence for that review comes from the lift monitoring itself, which is one reason instrumenting lift equipment pays off well beyond day-to-day operations.

Reading the Early Warnings by Method

Each lift method advertises its problems in a characteristic way. An ESP shows distress through motor current and temperature: unstable current suggests gas interference or a degrading pump stage, while rising temperature suggests inadequate cooling flow past the motor. A rod-pumped well tells its story through the dynamometer card, whose shape distinguishes a well pumped down from gas interference from mechanical trouble - and stopping the unit before it pounds fluid is exactly what a pump-off controller exists to do.

Gas lift tends to drift rather than break: injection pressure and rate wander as valves wear or compression struggles, and the well may head - cycling between flowing and loading - long before anything fails outright. Plunger lift health reads through arrival behavior: a plunger arriving late or not at all means the well lacks the energy to lift its liquid load and the cycle settings need attention.

Method	Key monitored signals
ESP	Pump intake pressure, motor current and temperature, drive frequency, vibration
Rod pump	Surface load and position (the dynamometer card), motor current, run time
Gas lift	Injection rate and pressure, tubing and casing pressures
Plunger	Arrival sensor, casing, tubing, and line pressures, cycle times
PCP	Torque, rotation speed, pump intake pressure

What the Measurements Have in Common

Across every method, the valuable signals share a trait: they are trends, not single readings. One warm motor reading or one late plunger arrival means little; a week of steady drift means a developing problem with time to plan a response instead of reacting to a failure. That makes continuous collection and history the backbone of lift optimization - the field controller runs the equipment second to second, while the accumulated history answers the bigger question of whether the method itself is still the right one.

It also means alarm design differs from ordinary process alarming. Lift problems are mostly slow, so deviation-from-baseline and rate-of-change alarming catch them earlier than fixed thresholds, and a scheduled engineering review of cards, cycles, and trends catches what alarms cannot. Wells fail individually, but the review works fleet-wide: the well behaving differently from its offset neighbors is the one to look at first.

Frequently Asked Questions