Primary resistance starting is an older reduced-voltage method that inserts resistors in series with the stator windings during startup, dropping some of the line voltage across the resistors so the motor sees a reduced voltage, then short-circuiting the resistors out as the motor accelerates so it finishes on full voltage. Because the resistors are simply bypassed rather than disconnected, the transition is inherently closed, giving a smooth acceleration with no reconnection surge. Its defining characteristic is that the voltage the motor sees rises gradually as it speeds up, since the current falls and so does the drop across the fixed resistors, producing a naturally smooth ramp toward full voltage. This page explains the closed transition, the heat the resistor bank dissipates, and why solid-state soft starters and drives have largely replaced it.
Primary Resistance Starting in one line: Primary resistance starting places resistors in series with the motor's stator windings during startup, dropping part of the line voltage so the motor starts at reduced voltage, then shorts the resistors out for full-voltage running once the motor is near speed. Because the resistors are bypassed rather than disconnected, the transition is closed with no surge, and the voltage the motor sees rises smoothly as it accelerates. It is largely superseded by solid-state soft starters and variable frequency drives, which do the same job with less wasted heat and more control.
In a primary resistance starter, a resistor is connected in series with each phase of the motor's stator supply during startup. At the moment of starting the motor draws heavy current, and that current flowing through the series resistors produces a voltage drop across them, so the voltage that actually reaches the motor terminals is less than the full line voltage. The motor therefore starts at reduced voltage, drawing less current and developing less torque than it would across the line, which is the whole point of any reduced-voltage method.
What makes primary resistance starting distinctive is that the reduced voltage does not stay fixed; it rises on its own as the motor accelerates. As the rotor speeds up the motor draws less current, and with less current flowing through the fixed resistors the voltage dropped across them falls, so more of the line voltage reaches the motor. The result is a naturally increasing voltage at the motor terminals over the course of the start, a smooth ramp that comes for free from the interaction of the falling current and the fixed resistance, without any active control.
Once the motor is near running speed, a contactor closes across the resistors to short them out, connecting the motor directly to the full line for normal running. Because the resistors are simply bypassed while the motor stays energized, there is no break in supply and no out-of-phase reconnection; the transition is inherently closed. This smoothness, both the gradual voltage rise during the start and the surge-free final transition, is the method's main appeal and the reason it gave a gentler start than an open-transition wye-delta or autotransformer scheme of its era.
The mechanism that makes primary resistance starting work, dropping voltage across series resistors, also gives it its central drawback: the resistors turn the dropped voltage into heat. During every start the heavy motor current flows through the resistor bank, and the energy that does not reach the motor is dissipated as heat in those resistors. This makes the method inefficient compared with a transformer-based approach, and it limits how frequently a motor can be restarted, because the resistor bank needs time to cool between starts. The resistors are physically substantial, rated to absorb the starting energy without overheating, and they take up space and add mass to the installation.
The wasted heat is why primary resistance starting delivers relatively poor torque per amp. Unlike an autotransformer, which reduces line-side inrush more than motor torque, a resistor start reduces both by similar amounts and burns real energy doing it, so it draws more current from the line for the torque it delivers. For a load that starts easily this is acceptable, but the combination of energy loss, restart limitations, and the bulk of the resistor bank made the method less attractive as alternatives matured.
There is also the matter of tuning. The resistance value is chosen for a particular motor and load to give the desired starting voltage, and it is essentially fixed once selected; the smooth voltage rise is a consequence of the physics rather than an adjustable profile. This lack of flexibility, together with the fixed heat penalty, means primary resistance starting offers little of the adaptability that later electronic methods provide, which is a large part of why it fell out of favor for new installations even though existing resistor starters continued to run reliably for years.
Solid-state soft starters do electronically what primary resistance starting does with hardware, and they do it better. Instead of burning voltage across resistors, a soft starter uses thyristors to phase-control the voltage delivered to the motor, ramping it up smoothly with almost no wasted energy and no bulky resistor bank to dissipate heat or limit restart frequency. It also gives a genuinely adjustable ramp, current limit, and other tunable settings rather than the single fixed profile a resistor bank provides, so it can be tailored to the load. For most applications that once used primary resistance starting, a soft starter is smaller, cooler, and far more flexible.
Variable frequency drives go further still, controlling both voltage and frequency to start a motor with very low current and full speed control throughout, which no resistor start can approach. Between the soft starter and the drive, the reasons to specify a new primary resistance starter have largely disappeared, and the method survives mainly on legacy installations where the existing hardware still works. Understanding it remains useful, though, because those resistor starters are still in service, and recognizing the method explains the behavior a maintainer sees.
From a monitoring standpoint, a primary resistance start shows a current signature that reflects its smooth, passive voltage rise: current starts reduced and eases down as the motor accelerates and the terminal voltage climbs, with a step at the moment the resistors are shorted out and the motor connects to full line. In a cloud SCADA view this differs from the two-step plateau of an autotransformer or wye-delta start and from the actively shaped ramp of a soft start. For a remote site running a legacy resistor starter, surfacing that start profile lets an operator confirm the bypass contactor is closing on schedule and the resistors are being shorted out cleanly, catching a stuck-in-resistance condition that would leave the motor running through the resistor bank and overheating it, a fault that would otherwise be invisible until something failed.
Because the resistors are shorted out by a bypass contactor while the motor stays energized, rather than the motor being disconnected and reconnected. There is no open gap in the supply during the changeover, so the motor never coasts out of phase and there is no reconnection surge. That inherent closed transition, together with the smooth voltage rise during the start, is the method's main advantage over open-transition schemes.
The resistors are fixed, but the current through them falls as the motor accelerates and draws less current. Less current through a fixed resistance means a smaller voltage drop across the resistors, so more of the line voltage reaches the motor terminals over the course of the start. The rising terminal voltage is a natural consequence of the physics, giving a smooth ramp without any active control.
Primary resistance starting wastes energy as heat in the resistor bank, needs cooling time between starts, and offers only a single fixed profile. A solid-state soft starter phase-controls the voltage electronically with almost no wasted energy, no bulky resistors, and an adjustable ramp and current limit. A variable frequency drive adds full speed control and very low starting current. Both are smaller, cooler, and more flexible, so new installations use them while resistor starters survive mainly on legacy equipment.
Merobix reads your field devices into a cloud SCADA - the real thing behind these terms, live in days from any browser.