EPA OOOOb Associated Gas Flaring Limits
Associated gas - the gas that comes up with oil at a well that is not built to sell it - has long been the easiest thing to flare, and OOOOb is written specifically to change that habit. This page explains how the rule approaches associated gas from affected oil wells, why it pushes operators up a hierarchy toward using the gas instead of burning it, and what an operator has to monitor and document to show which path a given well is on. It is aimed at production and compliance staff, not at reproducing the rule.
OOOOb Associated Gas Limits in one line: For affected oil wells, OOOOb associated gas provisions push operators away from routine flaring and venting and toward using the gas - routing it to a sales line, using it on site, or reinjecting it - with flaring treated as a fallback that must itself meet control and monitoring expectations. The rule expresses a preference hierarchy: capture or use the gas where feasible, and where a control device is used, keep it operating and document it.
The Preference to Use the Gas, Not Burn It
The organizing idea of the associated gas provisions is a hierarchy. The preferred outcomes put the gas to use: routing it into a gas sales line, consuming it on site as fuel, reinjecting it, or using it for another beneficial purpose. Only when those options are genuinely not available does the rule contemplate sending the gas to a control device, and even then routine flaring is discouraged rather than treated as a default. The shift is from flaring-first to flaring-as-last-resort.
This reframes a decision operators used to make casually. A well that produces a modest volume of associated gas with no nearby pipeline was historically flared without much thought; under the rule the operator is expected to have evaluated the use options and to be able to explain why the gas is being controlled rather than used. The burden moves toward justifying flaring, not toward justifying capture. The broader picture of getting captured gas back into the system is covered in the explainer on flare gas recovery.
The framing connects directly to Texas practice, where reducing routine flaring is also a state concern. An operator working a well in Texas is navigating both the federal preference and the state's flaring rules at once, which is why the associated gas question rarely lives on the federal side alone. The Texas dimension is discussed in the explainer on Statewide Rule 32 flaring.
When Flaring Is Used, the Control Still Counts
Where the use options are not available and gas is sent to a control device, the obligation does not end at pointing the gas at a flare. The control has to actually perform, which for a flare means a lit, stable flame achieving good combustion rather than a smoking or unlit tip. A flare that goes out is not controlling anything; it is venting raw gas while appearing to comply. This is the same performance principle that governs any combustion control, discussed under the mechanics of the flare tip and pilot.
That means the flare's own health becomes a compliance parameter: pilot presence, flame detection, and the conditions that keep combustion efficient. An operator relying on flaring to control associated gas has to be able to show the flare was lit and performing during the periods gas was routed to it, not merely that a flare exists on the pad. An unlit flare during a production period is both an emissions event and a compliance failure, and it is invisible without monitoring.
The associated gas volume itself also matters, because the rule's framing turns on how much gas is being handled and by which route. Measuring the associated gas - what was captured, what was used on site, what went to the control - is what lets an operator characterize the well against the hierarchy. The measurement side is covered in the explainer on the flare gas flow meter.
Monitoring the Path Each Well Takes
Because the associated gas provisions are about which path the gas takes and whether the fallback control worked, the compliance story is fundamentally a monitoring story. The operator needs to know, over time, whether a well's gas was captured, used, reinjected, or flared, and if flared, whether the flare was performing. Those are continuous states, not a single snapshot, so they call for continuous data rather than a spot check.
A cloud SCADA platform such as Merobix supports this by trending the flare's flame and pilot status, the flow to the control versus to sales or fuel, and the periods each route was active, so the history shows how a well's associated gas was actually handled across a reporting period. A flare that dropped out during a production window shows up as a gap in flame status against continued flow, which is exactly the event the rule cares about and exactly what a paper log tends to miss.
The reporting payoff is that the well's associated gas story assembles from stored data rather than reconstruction. Whether the operator is documenting that gas was captured to sales, or accounting for the volume that had to be flared and demonstrating the flare performed, the timestamped record carries the evidence. That same data supports the state and federal flaring and venting submissions an operator has to file for each well's gas.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does OOOOb ban flaring of associated gas outright?
No. The associated gas provisions establish a preference hierarchy that favors using the gas - routing it to sales, using it on site, or reinjecting it - and treats flaring as a fallback for when those options are not available, rather than banning flaring entirely. Where flaring is used, the control still has to perform and be documented. The practical effect is that the burden shifts toward justifying why gas is being flared rather than used, so routine flaring by default is what the rule is designed to reduce.
What do I have to monitor if I flare associated gas?
The key parameters are whether the flare was actually performing during the periods gas was routed to it - pilot presence and flame detection so the flare was lit and combusting rather than venting raw gas - and the associated gas volume and routing so you can characterize the well against the use-versus-flare hierarchy. An unlit flare during a production window is both an emissions event and a compliance failure, and it is essentially invisible without continuous monitoring of flame status against gas flow, which is why these points belong on live SCADA.
How do the federal associated gas rules interact with Texas flaring rules?
An operator working an oil well in Texas is subject to both at once: the federal preference to use rather than flare associated gas, and the state's flaring rules administered by the Texas Railroad Commission. They are separate obligations that both push in the direction of reducing routine flaring, so the associated gas decision usually has to satisfy both a federal and a state requirement. Operators generally handle them together, documenting capture, use, or justified flaring in a way that supports both the federal record and the state flaring authorizations.
Automation services
Need help turning this into a working system?
Merobix integrates SCADA, programs Allen-Bradley and Siemens PLCs, and designs and fabricates industrial control panels.
Meeting requests are reviewed before confirmation.